Ҵýƽ

Skip to main content

ICE to Income: How Increased Enforcement is “Freezing” Our Economy

Introduction

On July 4th, 2025, Immigration Customs and Enforcement (ICE) was given $75 billion under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), making history as the largest funded law enforcement agency in the U.S. The intention of this massive funding was to allow the Trump Administration to conduct the largest mass deportation campaign in history. Based on this alone, the administration assumed such a hefty investment would pay off in the long-run, benefitting many areas of the structure of the United States. With mass media attention, intense protests across the country, and dozens of criticisms coming from governmental organizations in DC, it’s easy to assume such procedures have been nothing but successful.

However, what if we are not hearing the full story? Well, one thing the headlines are not encompassing is this: businesses are suffering. Their employees aren’t showing up to work in fear of arrest. Manual labor can’t happen because employees who are being questioned with undocumentation are disappearing from the industry. Entry-level jobs that usually require specific skills and physical exertion are not receiving the employment needed to continue. With companies attempting to continue functionality in lieu of ICE, what is happening to America's economy, and is our administration noticing the effects it may be causing? In response to this inquiry, I will be identifying how the increased intensity of ICE’s current immigration enforcement has led to an inverse correlation in the United States’ GDP and economic stability.

Economic Consequences

Examining a modern issue with constitutional equivalence requires some historical points for reference. Undocumentation became the center of debate in the late 19th to early 20th centuries, as the Chinese Exclusion Act (1882), the Johnston-Reed Act (1924), and the Immigration Reform and Control Act (1986), were all enacted in response to labor demand, regional conflict and quota restrictions. However, Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America,published by Mae M. Ngai, reminds us that with the legal implementations of alienation and creating immigration laws, “the government can only resolve the situation via the legalization of their status” (Ngai, 2014). Therefore, we must expect the reconstruction of enforcement systems of labor markets. We are beginning to see the shift in enforcement systems, but the shift in labor markets is not going as noticed.

As neglected as this is, it is still starting to cause large-scale issues. Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy has observed that more than 8 million undocumented immigrants are currently working in the U.S in fields such as construction, agriculture, hospitality, etc. In that sense, they could predict that mass deportations would not open these positions up, but instead lead to 44,000 fewer jobs for U.S-born workers, ultimately causing a 2.6% to 6.2% decrease in GDP over the next decade (Payan & Rodríguez-Sánchez, 2025). With the potential of lower tax income, inflated prices, and the destruction of key sectors, increased ICE enforcement could be wreaking more havoc than what the Trump administration recognizes. Plus, even though the GOP has already dismantled many governmental organizations due to budget cuts, since immigrants make up the highest paying tax bracket, we could see a collapse of government programs such as Social Security and Medicare. Immigrants carry a “multiplier effect” with them, according to JEC Democrats, that workers in these sectors create even more jobs (Joint Economic Committee Democrats, 2024). In turn, this is what leads to such a significant loss in the job market and in turn, our country’s Gross Domestic Product.

This is recognized through national data, but researching local effects also helps us understand how the economic effects are individually affecting people. A strong example of a city who has taken the biggest burden to this change has been the Twin Cities in Saint Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota. Drawing emotional stories from one-on-one stories, The New York Times encaptures how the economic impacts are causing many structure changes: Worker disappearances, business leaders staying silent, and steep revenue declines, the Twin cities are facing the “the most visible economic pain of all urban centers” across the US Due to the Immigration Customs Enforcement (The New York Times, 2026). If these harsh changes from the intensity of ICE are being noticed both locally and nationally, studies need to be conducted in order to measure just how impactful the economic change is.

Case Study

It must be noted that not all data has been released in regard to the GDP as of April of 2026, and therefore, observing and utilizing methods that notice trends, not significant changes, can help us predict the economic effects of ICE. So, by cross-tabulating, or conducting a controlled comparison, setting data on ICE arrests, detentions, and deportations side by side with quarterly GDP change, we can generate effective results.

The Guardianhas measured trends in ICE by month from October 2024 to early February 2026, additionally noting where the administration enacted the OBBBA. The bar graph reached its peak from October 2025 to January 2026, ranging from 38,410-42,130 arrests per month. ICE detentions and deportations are also tracked to have steady inclines in the time period, even among the governmental shutdown in September-November 2025. Next, by placing alongside Real GDP, Percent Change From Preceding Quarter from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis allows for a smooth observation of similarities. Real GDP is measured quarterly against seasonally adjusted annual rates, and usually takes longer to formulate. Despite this, the lowest amount of change occurred in Quarter 1 of 2025 and Quarter 4 of 2025 (approximately January-March and October-December). Q1 had a percent change of -1.0, and Q4 had a change of just over 1.0.

Conclusion

From this data, the lowest changes in real GDP correspond not only with the beginning of the Trump Administration’s planning of increased ICE Funding, but Quarter 4 falls in line with the height of the most immigration arrests. We can conclude that therefore, the United States GDP does have a correlation with the effects of the Immigration Customs and Enforcement’s searches and seizures. And, at the moment, it appears to be inversely correlated, meaning that when arrests increase, GDP change decreases.

Catching these steady yet noticeable trends are not only vital for recognizing the collateral damage the increase in ICE enforcement is doing to business and economics, but it allows the option for proper cushioning for the future. Just analyzing one side of a potential problem may not always be enough-comparing it can recognize the unintended consequences that are also occurring, and an administration– like the current Trump Administration– that does not do that risks economic, social, institutional, and even democratic downfall. Those who are working in the sector of finance and management should not be facing the issues that are coming with potentially dangerous political decisions. And, the United States earns its title for a reason, and it’s because of the opportunity it offers to those who fight for a new and even better future. A strong, evidence-driven approach to politics that protects the rights and liberties of all working-class Americans can help protect our economic structure and our nation of opportunity.

References

Payan, T., & Rodríguez-Sánchez, J. I. (2025, March 26). Social and economic effects of expanded deportation measures. Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

Joint Economic Committee Democrats. (2024, December). Mass deportations would deliver a catastrophic blow to the U.S. economy.

The New York Times. (2026, February 2). Immigration raids damage local economies in Minnesota.

The Guardian. (2025, August 29). Trump immigration: ICE and CBP data.

U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2025). Gross domestic product, 4th quarter 2025 (advance estimate) [Chart].