Assistantships

Keep in mind that you are concurrently assessing the project’s merit and the student’s potential learning experience—a question of fit and a plan for success. In addition to the criteria below, we encourage you to take holistic considerations into account.

Questions to Consider

Do the student and mentor have a strong working relationship or plan to develop their ability to collaborate?
Does the student have ownership of the proposed work or state objectives that will enable them to engage their field?

Proposals supported by strong working relationships

show students and mentors “on the same page”
outline appropriately scaled projects with a reasonable plan
accurately communicate contributions to the larger field

Review Criteria

Context & Objectives

The proposal's objectives are clearly positioned within the "bigger picture" of the disciplinary frame or wider context.

Method & Strategy

The proposal clearly explains the methodology and/or strategy to achieve meaningful outcomes and objectives.

Scale & Scope

The proposal achieves meaningful learning outcomes in the award period without interfering with regular coursework and extracurricular obligations, including a timeline of activities.

Relevance

The proposal advances the student’s academic goals and/or professional aspirations.